🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass functions where Black people are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since its inception, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to erase Black history and experience from the records is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Black History is Now Month.